Sticky Notes of Thoughts

…because some thoughts are worth remembering

On Manufacturing 2.0

IMG_1581.JPG

Silicon Valley can be a very different place once you live there compared to how it is represented in business magazines. One thing for sure, though, is that it is a great place to learn. On any day, there are hundreds of meetups, workshops, ad hoc lessons given at coworking places, and conferences. Most associations, in addition to networking events, sponsor panels and discussion groups that target specific topics.

Here are some notes from a panel discussion on “Manufacturing 2.0” organized by Keizai Silicon Valley, a professional networking group for developing US-Japan business opportunities.

What’s different about the current manufacturing landscape, “Manufacturing 2.0” compared to the traditional model, trends and what’s around the corner:

  1. More opportunities for customization via smaller batches (“millions of me vs. millions of eaches”)
  2. “Think, make, market, & pray” model no longer works
  3. Bits move fast, and atoms are same everywhere, so sending instructions and specs can be downloaded for you to self-manufacture via 3-D printing and other technologies now more accessible to the public and businesses (“Make it yourself” movement)
  4. Incorporation of the arts and design into the engineering process (STEM vs. STEAM: Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, plus the Arts)
  5. Further incorporation of robotics into the manufacturing process but also robotics outside of factories (see #3, make your own robot kits, etc.)
  6. Technological advances in the raw materials (e.g., strength of silicon, heat-sensitive materials that provide 4th dimension to the 3-D printing process)
  7. Crowdfunding to test out the market, feasibility, and features, for rapid iterations in design, where we now have stores for what’s possible as a product vs. stores for already existing products
  8. The financial model for companies to count on big items that used to be cash cows at consumer shows, no longer works
  9. Rise of hybrid manufacturing, where 3-D printing is part of it (e.g., 3-D printed objects then treated with traditional lacquering, special coating)
  10. Different expectations for quality? The product can be considered perpetually in beta for crowdfunded items

The group identified 3 challenges as a result of the above:

  1. Better tools for collaboration (we need to see more innovations like Slack)
  2. Develop a model for how to address quality assurance in smaller batches and customized products
  3. Consistently pose the question “what to make” vs. merely “how to make” as the manufacturing process become cheaper and more accessible.

Photo: Stanford Museum, Palo Alto, California

 

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on November 27, 2015 by in Management and tagged , , .
Follow Sticky Notes of Thoughts on WordPress.com
%d bloggers like this: